Google
Thursday 
March 28, 2024 

AmosWEB means Economics with a Touch of Whimsy!

AmosWEBWEB*pediaGLOSS*aramaECON*worldCLASS*portalQUIZ*tasticPED GuideXtra CrediteTutorA*PLS
PERFECT PRICE DISCRIMINATION: A form of price discrimination in which a seller charges the highest price that buyers are willing and able to pay for each quantity of output sold. This is also termed first-degree price discrimination because the seller is able to extract ALL consumer surplus from the buyers. This is one of three price discrimination degrees. The others are second-degree price discrimination and third-degree price discrimination.

Visit the GLOSS*arama


CARDINAL UTILITY:

The notion that utility--the satisfaction of wants and needs achieved through the consumption of goods and services--can be measured with numerical values (1, 2, 3, etc.) that are based on a benchmark scale. Cardinal utility presumes that satisfaction is a measurable characteristic of a person, like height or weight. The contrasting notion is ordinal utility, which is based on a ranking of preferences.
Cardinal utility is a view of utility measurement based on the presumption that the satisfaction of wants and needs is a quantifiable characteristic of human activity. In other words, utility can be measured with numerical values (1, 2, 3, etc.) along a scale. If so, then the utility generated from consumption can be evaluated against an objective standard, which then makes it possible to compare utility among different goods and among different people.

Unfortunately, the cardinal measurement of utility has never been achieved, is probably impossible, and currently resides in the hypothetical realm of economic analysis. In the modern study of economics, cardinal utility is used exclusively as an instructional technique in consumer demand theory and utility analysis. However, even though cardinal utility is hypothetical, it does provide insight into consumer behavior, especially market demand and the law of demand.

Measuring Up

Early economists, led by Jeremy Bentham, developed the notion of utility based on the presumption that it was a measurable dimension of a person, much like height or weight.

To illustrate how cardinal utility would be measured, in principle, consider the cardinal measurement of another human trait--foot size.

Pollyanna Pumpernickel, a petite female, has a dainty foot that measures a scant 8 inches long. Winston Smythe Kennsington III, an average-sized male, offers an average-sized foot that measures 11 inches. Barton Broadway, a rather large human being, sports an enormous foot that measures 14 inches.

These three differentially sized feet can be easily compared.

  • First, based on the standard unit used for measuring length, the inch, it is readily obvious that Barton has the largest of the three feet, Paula the smallest, and Winston is in the middle.

  • Second, Barton's foot is 3 inches longer than Winston's foot. And Winston's foot is 3 inches longer than Paula's foot. The difference in length between Barton's foot and Winston's foot is exactly the same as the difference in length between Winston's foot and Paula's foot.

  • Third, anyone with a ruler and shoeless foot can compare the size of their foot with that of Barton, Winston, and Paula. How does Duncan Thurly, with an 12 inch foot compare? Bigger than Winston by an inch. Smaller than Barton by 2 inches. And surpassing Paula by 4 inches.

A Benchmark?

The ability to measure and compare the length of each person's foot is based on a standard measurement unit that provides a benchmark. In this case the standard unit is the inch. This unit is objective, quantifiable, and applies to everyone regardless of political affiliation, religious belief, cultural background, and personal preferences. An inch is an inch is an inch.

The cardinal measurement of utility requires a similar standard, a comparable objective measurement unit.

The hypothetical unit commonly used for instructional purposes is the "util." That is, an economics instructor might state that Duncan Thurly receives 10 utils from the consumption of a hot fudge sundae. Or Pollyanna Pumpernickel receives 5000 utils from listening to a song.

For the "util" measure to have meaning, to make it possible to compare the utility of one consumer with another, or to compare the consumption of one good with another, a "util" standard is needed, one that is objective, quantifiable, and applies to everyone regardless of political affiliation, religious belief, cultural background, and personal preferences.

Substantially Subjective

Such a "util" measurement standard does not exist. And such a standard is unlikely to be developed. The reason is that satisfaction and utility are subjective. In the same way that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" satisfaction is in the eye of the consumer. The satisfaction that Pollyanna Pumpernickel receives from listening to a song depends on her "political affiliation, religious belief, cultural background, and personal preferences."

Such subjectivity is likely to differ from person to person and for the same person from time to time. Does Paula receive more or less satisfaction than Barton Broadway from listening to the same song? Does Paula receive more or less satisfaction today than yesterday from listening to the same song? Does Paula receive more or less satisfaction from listening to one song than another? Yes or no or maybe. No one knows.

A Measure of the Future?

While the current, state-of-the-art understanding is that utility is not measurable, some have speculated that future measurement might be possible. Psychologists, neurologists, and others who study human behavior and the brain have made great strides in quantifying mental activity. Perhaps in the future, a util measure might be constructed based on the activity of brain neurons, the pattern of brain waves, or the composition of brain chemicals. It might happen. Who knows what the future will bring?

However, in the present day world of economic analysis cardinal utility remains purely hypothetical residing in the world of economic instruction.

<= CAPTURE THEORY OF REGULATIONCARTEL =>


Recommended Citation:

CARDINAL UTILITY, AmosWEB Encyclonomic WEB*pedia, http://www.AmosWEB.com, AmosWEB LLC, 2000-2024. [Accessed: March 28, 2024].


Check Out These Related Terms...

     | utility measurement | util | ordinal utility |


Or For A Little Background...

     | utility | consumer demand theory | utility analysis | total utility | marginal utility | satisfaction | market demand | third rule of subjectivity |


And For Further Study...

     | utilitarianism | marginal utility-price ratio | utility maximization | constrained utility maximization | consumer equilibrium | rule of consumer equilibrium | marginal utility and demand | marginal utility-price ratio | law of diminishing marginal utility |


Search Again?

Back to the WEB*pedia


APLS

GRAY SKITTERY
[What's This?]

Today, you are likely to spend a great deal of time strolling through a department store looking to buy either a set of serrated steak knives, with durable plastic handles or a pair of blue silicon oven mitts. Be on the lookout for pencil sharpeners with an attitude.
Your Complete Scope

This isn't me! What am I?

The 22.6% decline in stock prices on October 19, 1987 was larger than the infamous 12.8% decline on October 29, 1929.
"Good judgment comes from experience, and often experience comes from bad judgment."

-- Rita Mae Brown ‚ Writer

NPV
Net Present Value
A PEDestrian's Guide
Xtra Credit
Tell us what you think about AmosWEB. Like what you see? Have suggestions for improvements? Let us know. Click the User Feedback link.

User Feedback



| AmosWEB | WEB*pedia | GLOSS*arama | ECON*world | CLASS*portal | QUIZ*tastic | PED Guide | Xtra Credit | eTutor | A*PLS |
| About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement |

Thanks for visiting AmosWEB
Copyright ©2000-2024 AmosWEB*LLC
Send comments or questions to: WebMaster