April 21, 2024 

AmosWEB means Economics with a Touch of Whimsy!

AmosWEBWEB*pediaGLOSS*aramaECON*worldCLASS*portalQUIZ*tasticPED GuideXtra CrediteTutorA*PLS
REALISM OF MONOPOLY: If taken to the extreme, monopoly, like perfect competition is an ideal market structure that does not actually exist in the real world. In the extreme, a "pure" monopoly is a market containing one and only ONE seller of good, a good with absolutely, positively no substitutes. The product is absolutely, certifiably unique. It's not just that it has no CLOSE substitutes, it has NO substitutes. Period. End of story. In the real world, however, every product, no matter how seemingly unique it might appear, has substitutes. The substitutes might not be very close. They might be really, really bad substitutes. But they are substitutes. As such, there are no pure monopolies in the real world.

Visit the GLOSS*arama


The guidelines followed by groups of individuals or members of society when making collective or joint decisions that involve casting formal indications of choice (that is, votes). The five most noted voting rules are majority, super majority, unanimity, plurality, and weighted. These rules determine if a choice is or is not approved by the voting group. Voting rules are important for the study of public choice and government inefficiencies that arise in the voting process due to the median voter, logrolling, and the voting paradox.
Voting rules are the guidelines established in a election process to determine when an action, candidate, or policy is or is not approved. Without such guidelines there's no way of knowing the outcome. All sides can claim victory. If everyone wins, then no one wins. No decision is made.

The most common voting rule is majority, with the decision going to the side with one vote more than fifty percent. In some cases a super majority, with the standard being something greater than fifty percent, is used. The extreme case of super majority is unanimity, with a decision requiring unanimous approval. Another variation is plurality, with one side receiving the most votes although not majority. A last option is weighted, with importance of a particular vote based on something other than one person, one vote.

Public choice reveals that government inefficiency can arise through the voting process. The median voter principle indicates note only that the median voter determines the outcome of an election using the majority rule, but that the preferences of this voter does not necessarily reflect what is best for society. The voting paradox indicates that groups might cast votes for three or more options that are inconsistent. Logrolling arises when voters trade votes to ensure the success of two or more separate elections when each would not achieve success alone.

Five Rules

Five common voting rules are majority, super majority, unanimity, plurality, and weighted.
  • Majority: In most elections the majority rules. The candidate or option receiving the majority of the votes is the winner. The majority is defined as one vote more than fifty percent of the total number of votes cast. If 100 votes are cast, the majority is 51 votes. If 100 million votes are cast, the majority is 50 million and one (50,000,001).

  • Super Majority: In some elections a super majority is required for victory. A super majority is a specified fraction of votes greater than 50 percent and less than 100 percent. For example, a super majority of two-thirds is required for Congress to override a legislative veto by the President. A growing number of state and local governments require a super majority approval, usually in the range of 60 to 75 percent, for an increase in taxes.

  • Unanimity: Under some circumstances unanimous approval is require. That is, every voter must cast the same vote. Unanimity is used in elections where there is no room for doubt or disagreement. The most common example is court cases where a jury must vote unanimously for conviction or acquittal. Private clubs also employ unanimity vote when admitting new members.

  • Plurality: From time to time an election is won with a plurality of the votes. A plurality is defined as the most votes obtained when more than two candidates or options exist, but none receives a majority. If, for example, two of three candidates running for office receive 33 percent of the vote, then the third candidate with 34 percent receives the plurality. Presidential primary elections, which can have up to a dozen candidates, are commonly won with a plurality of the votes.

  • Weighted: While most elections place an equal weight on each vote cast (one person, one vote), some elections attach different weights to the votes. For example, the vote cast by one person might count twice as much as the vote cast by another. Elections for corporate officials typically assign voting weights based on the number of ownership shares held by the voters. Weights have also been based on the amount of land owned, the position held in a organization hierarchy, and even the ethnicity of the voter.
These voting rules can apply to society-wide general elections (such as that for the President) or for small groups (such as a committee of three). While some of the inefficiency voting problems revealed in the study of public choice are more likely for larger groups of voters, other problems are more important for smaller groups.

Voting Problems

Public choice indicates that the voting process is one source of government inefficiency. Efficiency is obtaining the greatest possible satisfaction from available resources. When people make consumption decisions directly, they do so based on the satisfaction they received. However, when government leaders in a representative democracy make the decisions, preferences are conveyed by voting. Public sector inefficiency often arises when the voting process does not convey preferences accurately.

Here are three noted voting problems.

  • Median Voter: This voting principle, one that is well known to politicians, is that the median voter determines the outcome of an election. The median voter is the one with an equal number of voters on either side of the vote. As such, the vote cast by THE median voter is the deciding vote. However, this median voter's preference might not generate the best, that is, efficient, result.

  • Voting Paradox: While the preferences of individuals is what we call transitive and consistent, the preferences of voters might not be consistent. That is, as a group, voters might prefer candidate A to candidate B and candidate B to candidate C, but then prefer candidate C to candidate A. This is not only paradoxical and confusing, it also can be inefficient.

  • Logrolling: This is the process in which voters trade votes to ensure the passage of two separate issues neither one of which would receive approval on its own. This is commonly done in legislative bodies. It's also something that can lead to an inefficient use of resources.

Voting Apathy

Another voting source of government inefficiency results from rational decisions made by voters (and as it turns out, nonvoters). A rational decision is undertaking an action if the benefits of the action outweigh the costs, or alternatively, not undertaking the action of the costs outweigh the benefits. Rational decisions result in what are termed rational ignorance and rational abstention.
  • Rational Ignorance: This is the decision NOT to become informed about a topic (such as what a political candidate wants to do) because the cost of acquiring the information is more than the expected benefit. Prospective voters might decide that it's not really worth their efforts to get ALL of the details on every candidate and issue on the ballot. They rationally choose to be ignorant.

  • Rational Abstention: This is the decision NOT to do something (such as vote in an election) because the cost of taking the action is more than the expected benefit. Prospective voters might decide that it's not really worth their efforts to participate in the political process or vote in an election. They rationally choose to abstain.


Recommended Citation:

VOTING RULES, AmosWEB Encyclonomic WEB*pedia,, AmosWEB LLC, 2000-2024. [Accessed: April 21, 2024].

Check Out These Related Terms...

     | public choice | median voter principle | logrolling | voting paradox | government failures | rational ignorance | rational abstention | principal-agent problem | special interest groups | government bureaucracies |

Or For A Little Background...

     | market failures | government functions | public finance | efficiency | public sector | private sector | utility maximization | market efficiency | fifth rule of imperfection | seven economic rules |

And For Further Study...

     | political entrepreneurs | capture theory of regulation | rent seeking | Tiebout hypothesis |

Search Again?

Back to the WEB*pedia


[What's This?]

Today, you are likely to spend a great deal of time wandering around the downtown area trying to buy either a revolving spice rack or a how-to book on home repairs. Be on the lookout for the last item on a shelf.
Your Complete Scope

This isn't me! What am I?

Only 1% of the U.S. population paid income taxes when the income tax was established in 1914.
"The vacuum created by failure to communicate will quickly be filled with rumor, misrepresentations, drivel and poison. "

-- C. Northcote Parkinson, historian

Income Received But Not Earned
A PEDestrian's Guide
Xtra Credit
Tell us what you think about AmosWEB. Like what you see? Have suggestions for improvements? Let us know. Click the User Feedback link.

User Feedback

| AmosWEB | WEB*pedia | GLOSS*arama | ECON*world | CLASS*portal | QUIZ*tastic | PED Guide | Xtra Credit | eTutor | A*PLS |
| About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement |

Thanks for visiting AmosWEB
Copyright ©2000-2024 AmosWEB*LLC
Send comments or questions to: WebMaster