Google
Wednesday 
April 24, 2024 

AmosWEB means Economics with a Touch of Whimsy!

AmosWEBWEB*pediaGLOSS*aramaECON*worldCLASS*portalQUIZ*tasticPED GuideXtra CrediteTutorA*PLS
INDIFFERENCE MAP: A graph of two or more indifference curves. Higher indifference curves are associated with higher levels of utility.

Visit the GLOSS*arama


PERFECT COMPETITION, MARGINAL ANALYSIS:

A perfectly competitive firm produces the profit-maximizing quantity of output that equates marginal revenue and marginal cost. This marginal approach is one of three methods that used to determine the profit-maximizing quantity of output. The other two methods involve the direct analysis of economic profit or a comparison of total revenue and total cost.
Perfect competition is a market structure characterized by a large number of small firms producing identical products with perfect resource mobility and perfect knowledge. These conditions mean a perfectly competitive firm faces a horizontal, or perfectly elastic, demand curve. With this horizontal demand curve, marginal revenue is equal to average revenue, both of which are also equal to price.

Comparable to any profit-maximizing firm, a perfectly competitive firm produces the quantity of output in the short run that generates the maximum difference between total revenue with total cost, which is economic profit. This profit maximizing level of production is also achieved by the equality between marginal revenue and marginal cost. At this production level, the firm cannot increase profit by changing the level of production. The analysis of marginal revenue and marginal cost can be achieved through a table of numbers or with marginal revenue and marginal cost curves.

Working the Numbers

A perfectly competitive firm is presumed to produce the quantity of output that maximizes economic profit--the difference between total revenue and total cost. This decision can be analyzed using the exhibit below. This table presents revenue and cost information for Phil the zucchini grower, a hypothetical example of a perfectly competitive firm.

Because the zucchinis Phil produces are identical to those produced by gadzillions of other zucchini growers, he has no market control and must sell his zucchinis at the going market price of $4 per pound. Phil is a price taker. Phil's status as a perfectly competitive, price-taking firm is reflected in this table.

    The Zucchini Numbers
    Profit Maximization
  • Quantity: The first column presents the quantity of output produced, ranging from 0 to 10 pounds of zucchinis.

  • Total Revenue: The second column presents total revenue, ranging from a low of $0 for no output to a high or $40 for 10 pounds of zucchinis. If Phil sells 1 pound of zucchinis, he receives $4 in total revenue. Total revenue is $8 for 2 pounds of zucchinis. The total revenue in the second column is the $4 market price times the quantity of zucchinis sold.

  • Total Cost: The fourth column presents the total cost incurred by the firm in the production of this output, ranging from a low of $3 for zero output to a high of $46 for 10 pounds of zucchinis. Because Phil has fixed cost, he incurs $3 of total cost even though he produces no zucchinis. Producing 1 pound of zucchinis incurs a total cost of $8. Producing 2 pounds of zucchinis incurs a total cost of $11. Total cost rises as Phil produces more.

  • Profit: The sixth column at the far right of the table is profit, the difference between total revenue in the second column and total cost in the fourth column. It begins at -$3, falls to -$4, rises to $7, then falls to -$6.
The task is to determine the which zucchini production level provides the maximum profit using marginal revenue and marginal cost. The process goes something like this:
  1. Marginal revenue indicates how much total revenue changes by producing one more or one less unit of output.
  2. Marginal cost indicates how much total cost changes by producing one more or one less unit of output.
  3. Profit increases if marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost and profit decreases if marginal revenue is less than marginal cost.
  4. Profit neither increases nor decreases if marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost.
  5. As such, the production level that equates marginal revenue and marginal cost is profit maximization.
The third and fifth columns are reserved for these two marginal measures. To display the numbers, click the [Marginals] button.
  • Marginal Revenue: Marginal revenue in the third column is a constant at the $4 per pound for every quantity of output. Marginal revenue is constant and equal to price because Phil is a perfectly competitive firm. The price is fixed and so too is marginal revenue.

  • Marginal Cost: Marginal cost in the fifth column starts at $5, declines to a low of $1.50, the rises again to $12. The declining values are the result of increasing marginal returns and the rising values are due to decreasing marginal returns and the law of diminishing marginal returns.
How can these marginals be used to identify the profit-maximizing output level?
  • First, a quick look at the profit column indicates that the profit-maximizing production is 7 pounds of zucchinis, which generates a profit of $7. Click the [Profit Max] button to highlight this result.

  • Second, with this outcome highlighted, note the corresponding marginal revenue and marginal cost values. Marginal revenue is $4 for the seventh pound of zucchini production and marginal cost is $3.

    Phil increases production from 6 pounds to 7 pounds because doing so generates $4 of extra revenue and incurs only $3 of extra cost, meaning his profit increases by $1 over the production of 6 pounds. Phil does not increase production from 7 pounds to 8 pounds because doing so generates only $4 of extra revenue but incurs $5 of extra cost, meaning his profit decreases by $1.

    As such, Phil settles in with the production and 7 pounds of zucchinis and achieves maximum profit. He cannot increase profit by changing production.


  • Third, while marginal revenue and marginal cost might not appear to be equal for this profit-maximizing 7 pounds of zucchini production ($4 versus $3), they really are. The reason is that the marginal numbers in the table actually represent discrete changes from one pound to the next. Reducing the size of the discrete change, say from 6.9999 pounds to 7 pounds, actually results in a marginal cost that is closer to $4. At the limit of an infinitesimally small change, marginal cost is exactly $4 and equal to marginal revenue.

    While the equality between marginal revenue and marginal cost shows up better in a graph, the best practical method of identifying similar results using a table of numbers such as this one, is to average the discrete changes on either side of the quantity. For example, the marginal cost AT the seventh pound of zucchini production is the average of the change from 6 to 7 ($3) and from 7 to 8 ($5), which is $4.

Working the Curves

The Zucchini Curves
Profit Maximization

The short-run production decision for a perfectly competitive firm can be graphically illustrated using marginal revenue and marginal cost curves. The exhibit to the right is standing poised to display these curves.
  • Marginal Revenue: A click of the [Marginal Revenue] button reveals a horizontal, perfectly elastic green line labeled MR that depicts the marginal revenue Phil receives from zucchini production. The line is horizontal at the constant value of $4.

  • Marginal Cost: A click of the [Marginal Cost] button reveals a red U-shaped curve labeled TC that represents the marginal cost Phil incurs in the production of zucchinis. The shape is based on increasing, then decreasing marginal returns.
The key for Phil is to identify the production level that gives the greatest level of economic profit. Profit is maximized at quantity of output found at the intersection of the marginal revenue and marginal cost curves, which is 7 pounds of zucchinis. Click the [Profit Max] button to highlight this production level.

To demonstrate why the equality between marginal revenue and marginal cost is the profit-maximizing production level, consider what results if marginal revenue is not equal to marginal cost:

  • If marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost, as is the case for small quantities of output, then the firm can increase profit by increasing production. Extra production adds more to revenue than to cost, so profit increases.

  • If marginal revenue is less than marginal cost, as is the case for large quantities of output, then the firm can increase profit by decreasing production. Reducing production reduces revenue less than to it reduces cost, so profit increases.

  • If marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost, then the firm cannot increase profit by producing more or less output. Profit is maximized.

<= PERFECT COMPETITION, LOSS MINIMIZATIONPERFECT COMPETITION, PROFIT ANALYSIS =>


Recommended Citation:

PERFECT COMPETITION, MARGINAL ANALYSIS, AmosWEB Encyclonomic WEB*pedia, http://www.AmosWEB.com, AmosWEB LLC, 2000-2024. [Accessed: April 24, 2024].


Check Out These Related Terms...

     | perfect competition, short-run production analysis | perfect competition, total analysis | perfect competition, breakeven output | perfect competition, profit analysis | short-run production alternatives | perfect competition, profit maximization | perfect competition, loss minimization |


Or For A Little Background...

     | perfect competition | perfect competition, characteristics | total revenue, perfect competition | total revenue | total cost | profit | profit maximization |


And For Further Study...

     | perfect competition, demand | long run industry supply curve | perfect competition, long-run production analysis | perfect competition, efficiency | perfect competition, short-run supply curve |


Search Again?

Back to the WEB*pedia


APLS

WHITE GULLIBON
[What's This?]

Today, you are likely to spend a great deal of time touring the new suburban shopping complex wanting to buy either an AC adapter that won't fry your computer or a case for your designer sunglasses. Be on the lookout for telephone calls from former employers.
Your Complete Scope

This isn't me! What am I?

The portion of aggregate output U.S. citizens pay in taxes (30%) is less than the other six leading industrialized nations -- Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, or Japan.
"The greatest things ever done on Earth have been done little by little. "

-- William Jennings Bryan

GATS
General Agreement on Trade in Services
A PEDestrian's Guide
Xtra Credit
Tell us what you think about AmosWEB. Like what you see? Have suggestions for improvements? Let us know. Click the User Feedback link.

User Feedback



| AmosWEB | WEB*pedia | GLOSS*arama | ECON*world | CLASS*portal | QUIZ*tastic | PED Guide | Xtra Credit | eTutor | A*PLS |
| About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement |

Thanks for visiting AmosWEB
Copyright ©2000-2024 AmosWEB*LLC
Send comments or questions to: WebMaster