Google
Tuesday 
June 19, 2018 

AmosWEB means Economics with a Touch of Whimsy!

AmosWEBWEB*pediaGLOSS*aramaECON*worldCLASS*portalQUIZ*tasticPED GuideXtra CrediteTutorA*PLS
INDUCED: The general notion that changes in one variable are related to, or caused by, changes in another variable. Induced relations, especially changes in consumption expenditures are induced by changes in disposable income, are a key aspect of Keynesian economics and the multiplier effect. The alternative to an induced relation between variables is an autonomous relation, in which one variable is not related to another.

Visit the GLOSS*arama


COMMON-PROPERTY GOODS:

Goods characterized by rival consumption and the inability to exclude nonpayers. Common-property goods are one of four types of goods differentiated by consumption rivalry and nonpayer excludability. The other three goods are private (rival consumption and nonpayers can be excluded), public (nonrival consumption and nonpayers cannot be excluded), and near-public (nonrival consumption and nonpayers can be excluded). Nonrival consumption and the ease of excluding of nonpayers means common-property goods cannot be efficiently exchanged through markets and are often overconsumed.
Common-property goods are one of four types of goods differentiated by consumption rivalry (rival or nonrival) and nonpayer excludability (excludable and nonexcludable). In particular, these are goods characterized by rival consumption, meaning the consumption by one person imposes an opportunity cost on others, but without the ability to exclude nonpayers from gaining benefits from consumption.

Common-Property Goods
PbFn25
The exhibit to the right illustrates the four alternative types of goods -- private, public, common-property, and near-public -- based on the mix of consumption rivalry and nonpayer excludability. Common-property goods are in the bottom left cell of the matrix, with rival consumption and the inability to exclude nonpayers.

Common-property goods are owned by everyone, meaning property rights are not controlled by anyone in particular. Even though consumption by one imposes an opportunity cost on others, one person cannot prevent another from consumption. These goods cannot be efficiently exchanged through markets and governments are often called upon to control their use. The best examples of common-property goods come from the assorted natural resources available to the planet, including the atmosphere, oceans, lakes, rivers, and wilderness areas. Because individuals and businesses in the private sector cannot effectively exclude nonpayers from consumption, governments step in to regulate and oversee the use of common-property goods.

Common-property goods need government intervention. Rival consumption means marginal cost is greater than zero. Efficiency is served if users then pay a price equal to marginal cost. Unfortunately the inability to exclude nonpayers means that a price cannot be charged. Then end result is that common-property goods are overused or overconsumed. In the case of many natural resources, such as the atmosphere, oceans, and wildlife, they can be overconsumed to the point of complete exhaustion. Governments need to regulate their use. In some cases they can do so effectively and efficiently. In other cases they can not.

Some Common Examples

The best examples of common-property goods come from the natural environment. The atmosphere, oceans, other large bodies of water, and wilderness areas are common-property goods. These goods are readily accessible to all users. No one can be excluded from using the air or the oceans. However, the use by one person can impose an opportunity cost on other uses. For example, air pollution can impose an opportunity cost on others through respiratory problems. Or the fish caught by one person cannot be caught by another.

Rival Consumption

Because common-property goods, like private goods, are rival in consumption, the consumption by one person prevents the simultaneous consumption by others. This means consuming a common-property good, like the consumption of a private good, imposes an opportunity cost on others who are not able to consume.

Suppose, for example, that Edgar Millbottom wants to do a little marlin fishing off the coast of Florida. To the extent that Edgar is successful and catches a magnificent marlin, then others, like Alicia Hyfield, are unable to receive the benefits of catching this fish, which imposes an opportunity cost.

Whether the good is private or common-property, rival consumption means that efficiency is best achieved when those who benefit from consumption pay a price equal to the opportunity cost. Markets accomplish this for private goods, but not for common-property goods.

Nonpayer Nonexcludability

Unlike private goods, but like public goods, common-property goods are characterized by the inability to exclude nonpayers from gaining ownership and control. As such, everyone in society can receive the benefits of consumption. No one can be excluded. In other words, common-property goods do not have well-defined property rights. Everyone owns a public good, meaning no one in particular can exert exclusive ownership and control.

Again, let's turn to Edgar Millbottom's marlin fishing off the coast of Florida. Edgar, Alicia, and anyone else can gain access to marlin fishing off the coast of Florida. Restricting access is virtually impossible.

With nonpayer nonexcludability, common-property goods cannot be exchanged through markets. Ownership and control cannot be transferred only to those who pay.

Enter Governments

The combination of rival consumption and nonpayer nonexcludability means that common-property goods cannot be exchanged through markets, but should be for efficiency. Even though people are not able to control access to and transfer ownership of common-property goods, governments can do so with more success. This is most often accomplished by laws and regulations. For example, laws might restrict the number of marlins caught off the coast of Florida or the amount of pollution emitted into the atmosphere.

Three Other Goods

Common-property goods are only one of four types of goods characterized by consumption rivalry and nonpayer excludability. The three are private goods, public goods, and near-public goods.
  • Private: Private goods are characterized by rival consumption and the ability to exclude nonpayers. Private goods can be easily, effectively, and efficiently exchanged through markets.

  • Public: Public goods are characterized by nonrival consumption and the inability to exclude nonpayers. Public goods cannot be exchanged through markets. The only efficient way to provide public goods is through governments.

  • Near-Public: Near-public goods are characterized by nonrival consumption and the ability to exclude nonpayers. These goods are often exchanged through markets, but are more efficiently provided by governments.

<= COMMODITY MONEYCOMMUNISM =>


Recommended Citation:

COMMON-PROPERTY GOODS, AmosWEB Encyclonomic WEB*pedia, http://www.AmosWEB.com, AmosWEB LLC, 2000-2018. [Accessed: June 19, 2018].


Check Out These Related Terms...

     | public finance | consumption rivalry | nonpayer excludability | private goods | public goods | near-public goods | free-rider problem | public goods: demand | public goods: efficiency |


Or For A Little Background...

     | good | production | efficiency | consumption | market demand | market | market efficiency | government sector | public sector | property rights | private sector |


And For Further Study...

     | market failures | taxation principles | tax proportionality | tax effects | tax equity | involuntary exchange | benefit principle | ability-to-pay principle |


Search Again?

Back to the WEB*pedia


APLS

BLUE PLACIDOLA
[What's This?]

Today, you are likely to spend a great deal of time driving to a factory outlet hoping to buy either a square lamp shade with frills along the bottom or an electric coffee pot with automatic shutoff. Be on the lookout for defective microphones.
Your Complete Scope

This isn't me! What am I?

Helping spur the U.S. industrial revolution, Thomas Edison patented nearly 1300 inventions, 300 of which came out of his Menlo Park "invention factory" during a four-year period.
"The will to win is important, but the will to prepare is vital. "

-- Joe Paterno, football coach

ADV
Ad Valorem
A PEDestrian's Guide
Xtra Credit
Tell us what you think about AmosWEB. Like what you see? Have suggestions for improvements? Let us know. Click the User Feedback link.

User Feedback



| AmosWEB | WEB*pedia | GLOSS*arama | ECON*world | CLASS*portal | QUIZ*tastic | PED Guide | Xtra Credit | eTutor | A*PLS |
| About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement |

Thanks for visiting AmosWEB
Copyright ©2000-2018 AmosWEB*LLC
Send comments or questions to: WebMaster