Suppose, for example that a wolf howls in the distance, and then someone dies. A few days later, another wolf howls, then someone else breaks a leg. Once again a wolf howls, and then a third person falls sick. "Obviously" the howling wolf is causing bad things to transpire. While this howling-wolf explanation might seem reasonable to people spending their lives eating mastodon meat and sleeping in caves, correlation does not mean cause. These cave-dwelling folk are committing the fallacy of false cause.

Retrieving obvious (even ridiculous) examples of less enlightened human ancestors who perpetually committed this fallacy of false cause is exceedingly easy.

• The movement of the sun is caused by a god carrying a ball of fire across the sky.


• Warts can be cured by burying potato skins under an oak tree in the light of a full moon.


• The configuration of stars in the sky determines personality.

However, until cause-and-effect relations are verified using the scientific method, the fallacy of false cause is actually quite easy to commit, even among the best and the brightest. In fact, scientists (economists included) regularly commit this fallacy as they sort through numerous potential causes of an event to find the one "true" cause. Before a "false" cause has been undeniably proven as false and then discarded for further consideration, it is likely to be promoted as the "true" cause. Advocates truly believe that they are promoting the "true" cause.